Login   You are in: tecnopolo


The regional network


logo piattaforma innovate

logo piattaforma mech

logo piattaforma create

logo piattaforma greentech

logo piattaforma agrifood

logo piattaforma health

 

BIBLIOGRAPHY



>List all the bibliography
A dynamic energy comparison of additive and traditional manufacturing in sustainable customized product design for fashion through an interactive 3D web-platform. Projects: Ecosister, Spoke3: Work Package WP1, and WP3.
Authors Sergio Petronilli, Alessio Ubertini, Carlo Foschi  Year 2026
Pubblication type Paper International Journal with referee
Abstract The fashion accessories sector is increasingly characterized by mass customization, short production cycles, and growing attention toward sustainability-oriented manufacturing strategies. In this context, additive manufacturing technologies provide new opportunities for producing customized products without dedicated tooling, although their manufacturing-stage energy performance strongly depends on geometry complexity, process characteristics, and production scale. Existing manufacturing evaluation approaches are often disconnected from interactive design environments and are typically performed only after product geometry has already been finalized. This paper presents a real-time manufacturing-stage energy comparison framework integrated into a parametric 3D web platform for customized fashion accessories. The system combines Grasshopper-Rhinoceros parametric modelling with a web-based customization environment supported by Rhino.Compute architecture. The framework enables users to interactively modify product geometry while simultaneously estimating manufacturing-stage energy demand associated with different additive and conventional manufacturing technologies. The methodology focuses on comparative early-stage manufacturing-energy estimation intended to support geometry-aware manufacturing decision-making during product customization. The framework was validated through two relevant case studies from the fashion accessories sector: a customized necklace display and a jewellery closure system. The analysed manufacturing technologies included CNC machining, thermoforming, Fused Deposition Modelling, Multi Jet Fusion, investment casting, and Direct Metal Laser Sintering. The proposed framework contributes toward more energy-aware digital manufacturing workflows by integrating parametric design, web-based customization, and real-time manufacturing comparison. The results demonstrate that manufacturing-stage energy demand strongly depends on geometry configuration and production volume. Additive manufacturing technologies showed advantages for low volume customized production, while conventional manufacturing became progressively more competitive as production scale increased. Projects: Ecosister, Spoke3: Work Package WP1, and WP3.
Reference Sergio Petronilli, Alessio Ubertini, Carlo Foschi
WEB Reference https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S3050998X26000053
Repository reference DI134-012
Directly downloadable file /tecnopolo/download/bibliografia/A dynamic energy comparison of additive and traditional manufacturing in.pdf
Research unit PROTO-LAB
Keywords Sustainable manufacturing, Additive manufacturing, Energy efficiency, Cleaner production, Parametric design, Decision-support systems
LastUpdate 25/07/2026
Related research topics
Code Topic Description
1 Energy
3.2 Rapid prototyping and CAD Rapid prototyping and Reverse Engineering, CAD/CAM technologies

impact factor Falso




   


 

POR FESR

logo rete alta tecnologia emilia romagna

Fondo per lo sviluppo e la coesione
Il Laboratorio ha realizzato progetti finanziati dai Fondi europei della Regione Emilia-Romagna e dal Fondo per lo sviluppo e la coesione
Attrattività Ricerca Territorio - Emilia-Romagna
Sitemap
Termini di uso
Politica sulla Privacy
Accessibilita'

Share this page with

LinkedIN share Facebook share share
Dichiarazione di accessibilità 31fdd320-863d-11ef-95db-6df961374190